AUS/NZ
PC PS XBOX
z
AU
Rep:
45%
Member
Actually looks good keen to see it
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
52%
Member
Quote from hunterr on the 4th of May 2012:
what ? lol

Wow really? You said it will probably be okay but you don't like the actor actually playing the titular character. You might as well just not have an opinion if you can't decide what it is.
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
NZ
Rep:
47%
Member
A different take on spiderman but still looks like it will be good
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
59%
Member
Quote from OzFalcon on the 4th of May 2012:
Quote from Crazeh on the 4th of May 2012:
Movie looks alright i guess but DC>MARVEL

With the exception of Batman, movies-wise, DC is just fail. Are you reading the new 52 comics?
Green Lantern was pretty good. So was V for Vendetta.
Yeah i am reading the new 52. I have i think 31 first editions. Then ive got like 5 of The Red Lanterns and i think about 5 of The Red Hood and The Outlaws.
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
56%
Member
Quote from Crazeh on the 4th of May 2012:
So was V for Vendetta.
You mean, Hugo Weaving was good.
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
52%
Member
You mean hugo weaving is good, but that movie is a pile of shit.
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
56%
Member
Quote from l_w_88 on the 4th of May 2012:
You mean hugo weaving is good, but that movie is a pile of shit.
No, the movie was great because Hugo Weaving made it great
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
82%
Member
Donald for Spiderman
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
52%
Member
Quote from Tratty on the 4th of May 2012:
No, the movie was great because Hugo Weaving made it great

Spose you could argue that. I'm of the mind however, that a movie should be enjoyable based on the sum of its parts, not one actor's performance in what is otherwise a cliched clusterfuck of a plot.
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
59%
Member
I thought V for Vendetta was pretty good.
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
59%
Member
Quote from l_w_88 on the 4th of May 2012:
Quote from Tratty on the 4th of May 2012:
No, the movie was great because Hugo Weaving made it great

Spose you could argue that. I'm of the mind however, that a movie should be enjoyable based on the sum of its parts, not one actor's performance in what is otherwise a cliched clusterfuck of a plot.
How was it a cliched clusterfuck of a plot?
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
82%
Member
Quote from l_w_88 on the 4th of May 2012:

Wow really? You said it will probably be okay but you don't like the actor actually playing the titular character. You might as well just not have an opinion if you can't decide what it is.

because i dont really give a fuck that much about a movie, from first glance the actor looks abit pooey, but the story line looks pretty dope. so it could be decent. its a trailer, i won't know till i watch it will i?


and its cg, idc if my opinion is 100% or whatev doesnt bother me like it obviously bothers you
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
61%
Member
Quote from OzFalcon on the 4th of May 2012:
Why? Spiderman license is owned by Sony Pictures whilst everything Avengers is owned by I think Paramount.
Which is irrelevant because Stan Lee has rights to it all.

Edited once, 6/5/12 - 5:27am.
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
56%
Member
hmm i like the actor that played spiderman in the previous spiderman movies
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago
AU
Rep:
48%
Member
Toby did a good job, but his portrayal of spiderman felt kinda of.....Boy scout.

I understand Spiderman was a bit of a boy scout, but Toby made it seem like he was nothing but a whining bitch.

I like this new actor. He seems to portray Spiderman as darker with a back bone.
Quote
Downvote
Like
5.3 years ago